Post-May 1 Campaign Ideas for Four-Year Institutions Still Chasing Their Goals

male student with laptop smiling at camera

Every May, a quiet conversation happens at four-year institutions across the country. The deposit numbers come in, the team does the math, and someone closes a door to say what the dashboards already showed: we’re not there yet. 

If that’s you right now, you have a lot of company. Many institutions are reporting healthy application growth alongside softening deposits, which sounds contradictory until you remember that students are applying to more colleges than ever, direct admissions has expanded the pool, and the affordability conversation has gotten harder, not easier.  

Recent IPEDS data shows median yield at roughly 27 percent for public four-year institutions and 24 percent for private four-year institutions, and most enrollment leaders we talk to are running below their five-year averages on yield this spring. 

The good news, if there is good news in this conversation, is that May 1 is not the end of the cycle. Estimated summer melt rates of 10 to 40 percent mean even institutions sitting at goal have work ahead, and institutions chasing goal still have meaningful pipeline to convert because the window between May and August is one of the most underleveraged periods in the entire enrollment cycle. 

Here’s where to focus your time, budget, and attention if you’re a four-year institution that didn’t hit goal by May 1. 

What should colleges do after May 1 if they missed enrollment goals? 

The instinct is to spend the next four months trying to do everything. Don’t. The teams that close the gap in summer are the ones who pick three or four things and execute them obsessively. Here’s a priority order that consistently produces results: 

  1. Lock down your existing deposits first. Summer melt costs more than late-cycle recruitment, every single time. 
  1. Re-engage your warm-but-undecided pool, the students who applied, were admitted, but didn’t deposit anywhere yet that you can see. 
  1. Open targeted late-cycle campaigns for transfer students, adult learners, and gap-year returners. 
  1. Reactivate stop-outs and last-cycle melts, especially those who melted to no institution at all. 

That order matters. Every dollar spent on net new top-of-funnel awareness in May, June, or July is a dollar you should have spent in November. The math just doesn’t work this late in the cycle, with a few exceptions we’ll get to. 

Campaign 1: Protect the deposits you already have 

Your deposited students are a flight risk until move-in day. The Harvard Strategic Data Project estimates 10 to 40 percent of college-intending students don’t actually matriculate, and that’s broadly true even for students who have already deposited. For most four-year institutions, every percentage point of summer melt is worth a meaningful number of bodies, FTE, and tuition revenue. 

A few campaigns that consistently move the needle here: 

For first-generation and lower-income students specifically, the data is unambiguous: structured summer outreach can move enrollment by 8 percentage points or more. If your incoming class skews this way, this is the single highest-ROI campaign you can run all summer. 

Campaign 2: Re-engage your warm-but-undecided pool 

This is your biggest hidden opportunity, and most institutions misread it. 

Your pool of admitted students who didn’t deposit isn’t all dead pipeline. A meaningful share of them haven’t deposited anywhere yet. Some are still negotiating financial aid with their top choices. Some are dealing with family or financial circumstances that paused their decision. Some applied to your institution as a backup, got accepted to a top choice, and then watched the top choice’s financial aid offer come in lower than expected. 

This pool is most valuable in the May 5 to July 1 window. After that, students start to consolidate decisions or default to community college, and your conversion math gets much harder. 

Tactical campaigns that work here: 

A small caution: do not bombard this pool. Three to five touches across the entire May 5 to July 1 window is enough. The students in this pool who can be moved will respond to specific, well-timed outreach. The ones who can’t be moved get more annoyed with each generic email. 

Campaign 3: Open targeted late-cycle campaigns for non-traditional students 

This is the part of summer recruitment most four-year institutions underuse, and the data on it is striking. 

Adult learners (over 25), transfer students, military and veterans, and gap-year returners do not move on the May 1 timeline. Their decision cycles are shorter, more practical, and often initiated by a specific life event: a job change, a relocation, a tuition reimbursement benefit becoming available, or a community college credential just completed. The window from May to August is high season for this population, and your campaigns should reflect that. 

What to run: 

Stop-out and re-enrollment campaigns. Students who started at your institution and stopped out are some of your highest-converting prospects, period. A summer campaign aimed at re-enrolling stop-outs, with clear academic advising and financial aid pathways, often produces enrollments at a fraction of the cost of net-new recruitment. 

Campaign 4: Reactivate stop-outs and last-cycle melts 

This one is worth its own campaign because it’s so consistently underused. 

Every four-year institution has a list of students who applied last cycle, were admitted, and never enrolled anywhere we can verify. That list is gold. The students on it have already done the work to apply, have already passed your admissions criteria, and have already considered your institution seriously enough to apply. They’re a year older now, possibly a year more financially stable, and possibly reconsidering. 

A simple reactivation campaign for this list might look like: 

Costs on this campaign are minimal since the data is already in your CRM. The conversion rate is meaningfully higher than cold outreach because these students self-selected your institution at least once already. 

How should I split the budget across these campaigns? 

If you’re a four-year institution behind on goal post-May 1, a defensible budget allocation for the next 90 to 120 days looks roughly like this: 

Campaign Share of late-cycle budget Why 
Protecting existing deposits (melt prevention) 35-45% Highest ROI in the entire cycle. Cheapest students to keep. 
Warm-but-undecided re-engagement 20-30% Real pipeline still movable through June. 
Transfer, adult learner, non-traditional 20-30% Decision cycles align with summer. Where net-new students actually exist. 
Stop-out and last-cycle melt reactivation 5-10% Cheap to run, high relative conversion. 
Net-new top-of-funnel awareness 0-5% Almost nothing converts at this point in the cycle. Save for fall. 

Your exact split depends on where your gap is and which populations your institution actually serves. A regional public will weight transfer and adult learner higher. A small private will weight melt prevention and warm re-engagement higher. The principle holds either way: late cycle is for tightening, not expanding. 

What’s the one thing four-year institutions chasing post-May 1 goals should change first? 

Get your team on the same page about which campaigns are worth running and which are not. (AKA try and skip the end of cycle panic name buy.)  

The trap most institutions fall into is running every campaign at low effort, hoping that volume produces results. It doesn’t. Three campaigns executed obsessively will outperform eight campaigns executed haphazardly, every cycle, in every market. 

If you’re staring at a deposit gap and a calendar that suddenly feels short, the answer is not more activity. It’s tighter focus on the populations that actually move in summer, the campaigns that have evidence behind them, and the behavioral signals that tell you which students are still movable. 

Your prospects are still in your funnel. The question is whether you can see them, and whether you have the right campaign waiting when they come back. 

Want to talk through what your post-May 1 plan should look like? Schedule a discovery call and we’ll walk through what’s working across our partner institutions for late-cycle yield, summer melt prevention, and non-traditional student recruitment. 

AUTHOR: Mia Charette
As Capture’s VP of Marketing, Mia brings 13+ years of experience leading growth in EdTech and B2B SaaS, with previous roles at Niche, Harmonize, and Finalsite. She’s a creative, data-driven marketer who loves helping colleges and universities tell their story, reach the right students, and hit their enrollment goals.

agjorevski@capturehighered.com Avatar

Written by

← Previous
Next →